Find Ancestors
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
1851 census help please
Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
---|---|---|---|
|
cane | Report | 15 Sep 2015 21:02 |
This is the 1861 census...Please can I have some help with finding them on the 51 census please <3 |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Gee | Report | 15 Sep 2015 21:14 |
|
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
cane | Report | 15 Sep 2015 21:22 |
That's them Gin`s :-D |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
MargaretM | Report | 15 Sep 2015 21:22 |
Possible with grandparents. Ages are very difficult to read, I think grandfather is 60 something. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
cane | Report | 15 Sep 2015 21:24 |
Sorry Margee, not them :-( |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
MargaretM | Report | 15 Sep 2015 21:29 |
Yeah, just noticed surname was Cook not Crook. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
SylviaInCanada | Report | 15 Sep 2015 21:34 |
I admit that I wondered if Hannah was a second wife. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
cane | Report | 15 Sep 2015 21:39 |
He married Hannah pinnington in 1842 in Manchester, Then married Hannah Kay 1863....The first Hannah died somewhere inbetween |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Chris Ho :) | Report | 15 Sep 2015 21:42 |
http://www.1851-unfilmed.org.uk/intro.htm |
|||
|
KathleenBell | Report | 15 Sep 2015 21:49 |
If he didn't marry Hannah Kay until 1863 then isn't the Hannah on the 1861 census Hannah Pinnington? Her death must be somewhere between census day in 1861 and the marriage in 1863, or am I missing something? |
|||
|
cane | Report | 15 Sep 2015 21:50 |
:-( :-( |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
cane | Report | 15 Sep 2015 21:56 |
You are Dead right kath, but its not the marriage I was after as I have those and subsequent censuses,,,i just was after 1851 .. :-( |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Chris Ho :) | Report | 15 Sep 2015 22:01 |
Lancashire Birth indexes for the years: 1852 |
|||
|
cane | Report | 15 Sep 2015 22:03 |
Thanks Chris...that's brilliant :-) |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Chris Ho :) | Report | 15 Sep 2015 22:09 |
Lancashire Birth indexes for the years: 1851 |
|||
|
cane | Report | 15 Sep 2015 22:11 |
ive also just discovered a Sarah H crook with mmn pennington.on that sight Chris..wonder why it was changed to pinnington on the censuses...I only ever found Sarah H as just Sarah on the censuses |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
cane | Report | 15 Sep 2015 22:15 |
That Francis Crook was always popping up too every time I typed in William and Hannah crook..how very odd |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
SylviaInCanada | Report | 15 Sep 2015 22:20 |
cane .............. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
SylviaInCanada | Report | 15 Sep 2015 22:22 |
I've tried searching fro one or other of the children using just their forename, birth year +/- 2 and birth place, with parents' forenames and even one or 2 siblings .................... thinking that either Crook had been misspelled or mistranscribed, or they had been given the wrong surname as sometimes happened |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
cane | Report | 15 Sep 2015 22:33 |
awww thank you Sylvia, You`re a star...spose ile just plod on slowly.. :-) :-D |
|||
Researching: |