Genealogy Chat
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
Who filled in the Census forms for those who could
Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
---|---|---|---|
|
Phoenix | Report | 8 Jan 2005 10:05 |
Going on from what Christine said, London censuses are full of pitiful comments like "lodger took schedule". This copying process means that errors are creeping in right from the start. The elusive Bounton family turn up in 1881 as Bouriton. I can only assume there was a blot on the page! B |
|||
|
Unknown | Report | 8 Jan 2005 01:45 |
I am indeed...and one who should really go to bed too! Nite nite xx |
|||
|
John | Report | 8 Jan 2005 01:43 |
Lou, What an angel. I have no clue as to the predisposition of the "h" The records show Hopenshaw and google came up with Openshaw. But if details were transcibed to an enumerator it could easily be written with the "h" as that may have been what it sounded like at the time. Anything you can come up with please let me know and also if you incur any costs. Night night, sleep tight, make sure the bed bugs don't bite john |
|||
|
Unknown | Report | 8 Jan 2005 01:32 |
John Was the (H) deliberate? There's Openshaw and Higher Openshaw! Seeing as its you...I'm going to Manchester Records Office next week (I didn't get there before Christmas - long story). My thread is currently near the top of the other board. Chuck any info you have on it and I'll have a look for ya while I'm there! Lou x |
|||
|
John | Report | 8 Jan 2005 01:30 |
Lou, Might just have a thread for you. The only info I have on my G Grandad William Sands was that he was born on (H)Openshaw about 1859. He was a general labourer and they tended to follow suit from family john |
|||
|
Unknown | Report | 8 Jan 2005 01:20 |
John Openshaw is down the road from me! Lou |
|||
|
John | Report | 8 Jan 2005 01:17 |
Lou You are so right, I have a birth location as " Hopenshaw" which doesn't exist anywhere but "Openshaw" is an area in Lancashire. If someone is transcribing from a dialect - well - "divn't dush us wor just geordies" john |
|||
|
PennyDainty | Report | 8 Jan 2005 01:16 |
John got this from familyrecords.gov site The enumerator delivered a form known as a schedule to each household a few days before census night, and collected the completed schedules the day after. The census were then copied into the census enumerator's books. It is these books which have survived and which can be seen today on microform, or in some cases, digitally online. the original householder's schedules were later destroyed. I take it they helped the illiterate to fill them out as they do nowadays. Christine |
|||
|
John | Report | 8 Jan 2005 01:14 |
good grief !! look at the time ! the cat's need feeding and I need to tuck in the kids! |
|||
|
Unknown | Report | 8 Jan 2005 01:10 |
Margaret Me neither although I should be...up till 4am last night, up at 8am this morning....I think I'm just addicted to this tree. Have this strange magnetic pull that STOPS me closing the pooter down! Lou xxx |
|||
|
Margaret | Report | 8 Jan 2005 01:09 |
John Lou has spotted our assignations (spelling?) LOL Lou I had a late night last night and a very long lie in today and I'm not in the least bit tired yet. Margaret |
|||
|
Unknown | Report | 8 Jan 2005 01:06 |
Yes Margaret and John... I have noticed a pattern here...! Glad it's not just me who's an insomniac! Lou xx |
|||
|
Unknown | Report | 8 Jan 2005 01:06 |
The census forms were completed by an emunerator (and I'm sure that's spelt wrong!) - a government official, as you say. That doesn't mean to say that there aren't errors. Sometimes names were misheard or often the children in the household were the only literate ones and they may have had to guess at how the surname was to be spelt. Another point that was made as well recently was how strong local dialects were back then, compared to now, and how names could be mis-spelt simply because the official completing the forms wrote down what they thought they had been told Lou |
|||
|
Margaret | Report | 8 Jan 2005 01:05 |
John I assume it was the enumerator John we cant keep meeting like this, people will start talking LOL Margaret |
|||
|
John | Report | 8 Jan 2005 01:03 |
Was there govt. officials who came round on the 1870-80-90's and did it for them? All my g grandad could do was sign with an "x" for his mark, so little chance of filling in forms john |