Genealogy Chat

Top tip - using the Genes Reunited community

Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!

  • The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
  • You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
  • And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
  • The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.

Quick Search

Single word search

Icons

  • New posts
  • No new posts
  • Thread closed
  • Stickied, new posts
  • Stickied, no new posts

Daft spellings - can anyone help?

ProfilePosted byOptionsPost Date

hallyally

hallyally Report 2 Nov 2005 18:39

Can anyone suggest a really daft spelling to help me find my Gt Grandfather? The name is JOHN SOMERVILLE. more details below....

hallyally

hallyally Report 2 Nov 2005 18:45

Some kind people found my relly SAMUEL ELLIS GILBERT down as SAMUEL ELLEN ELBERT a couple of days ago and the thought has occurred to me that I have got to be more creative! I've been looking on Ancestry for JOHN CHARLES SOMERVILLE born 1866 or 1870(!) Holborn, with no luck after 1898 after my grandad was born. No death or 1901 census result either. What silly spelling can anyone suggest which might get a result? (Have tried poor souls in prison or workhouse with mere initials without finding anything)

Merry

Merry Report 2 Nov 2005 18:52

Are you saying he isn't with his wife and child(ren)??? Merry

Unknown

Unknown Report 2 Nov 2005 18:55

It could be Summerville or Somervill or Somervil, or it could be mistranscribed. My Smoothy family were transcribed as Lenorthey and Timothy, to give examples of how capital letter S can be misread. Why don't you know when he was born? What is his age and place of birth on 1881? nell

Merry

Merry Report 2 Nov 2005 18:58

Apart from mis-spelling his name, have you tried alternative places of birth? Bloomsbury Clerkenwell St Pancras Farringdon amongst others, are often substitutes for Holborn (which also gets spelled wrong - Hoburn or Holburn etc) Merry

Unknown

Unknown Report 2 Nov 2005 18:59

I can't find any John Somerville born around the right time on 1881 nor can I find his birth. What is your first recorded reference to him? nell

hallyally

hallyally Report 2 Nov 2005 18:59

Hi Merry! No, my Grandad was put into care from an early age - ill treated and abandoned my Mum always said - he is in Hospital for 1901, aged three (although some sites have him as 13 - someone put a tick next to the three!) Just a mystery where the pair disappeared to (his ma called ALICE EMILY nee GINN) Have tried various immigration sites etc Just thought that a bit of creative spelling might throw something up! Cheers

hallyally

hallyally Report 2 Nov 2005 19:07

Thanks all for the suggestions - I've tried all the SOMERVEL etc variations to no avail. Scrolled through oodles of JOHNs with mad spellings in mad places. He is there on 1871 census RG10/349 85 67 as being aged 5 There is a complication, as his marriage cert makes his birth 1870 but this can only be the 1866 JOHN lying about his age! (I've been going round and round on this one! I's soooo complicted! More details on application as they say)

hallyally

hallyally Report 2 Nov 2005 19:08

Have to go now - back later - cheers!

hallyally

hallyally Report 2 Nov 2005 22:20

nudging this as I'm back now! Allie

Unknown

Unknown Report 2 Nov 2005 23:54

How do you know that the 5 year old in 1871 is the same chap who married and lied about his age? nell

Unknown

Unknown Report 2 Nov 2005 23:57

Perhaps this explains the two dates: IGI Individual Record FamilySearch™ International Genealogical Index v5.0 British Isles Search Results JOHN CHARLES SOMERVILLE Birth: 09 MAR 1866 Christening: 27 MAR 1870 Saint Andrew, Holborn, London Parents: Father: GEORGE FREER SOMERVILLE Mother: MARY ANN nell

hallyally

hallyally Report 3 Nov 2005 13:26

Hello Helen That entry has been the reason why I am almost sure that it is he! There seems to be no alternative - Either there was a mistake when the entry was made, mistaking his christening for birth (he was 'done' at the same time as his younger bruv) or it was a deliberate attempt to bring his age nearer to his bride's! I had quite a heated debate about this on Rootsweb a while back - I had expressed my doubts when someone assured me that it MUST be him and was severely 'smacked on the wrist' for not bowing to her superioir knowledge!! lol This is why I prefer GR - everyone is so much nicer! Cheers Allie Any more ideas for the 1901 census though?

Heather

Heather Report 3 Nov 2005 13:30

As previously said, I have one of my lot with the S transcribed as L - have you tried that, as mad as it may seem.

hallyally

hallyally Report 3 Nov 2005 17:29

Thanks Heather I think I have tried the L option before, but will give it another go - as I said, I've been going round in circles on this one and my brain hurts from looking at all the options! Cheers Allie