Genealogy Chat

Top tip - using the Genes Reunited community

Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!

  • The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
  • You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
  • And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
  • The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.

Quick Search

Single word search

Icons

  • New posts
  • No new posts
  • Thread closed
  • Stickied, new posts
  • Stickied, no new posts

naming pattern used early 1700,s...it worked for s

ProfilePosted byOptionsPost Date

Ed

Ed Report 14 Mar 2006 18:57

this pattern evidently faded out gradually in the mid 1800,s. seemingly there are grounds to suggest it was often used. the FIRST SON was named after the FATHER,S FATHER the SECOND SON was named after the MOTHER,S FATHER the THIRD SON was named after the FATHER the FOURTH SON was named after the FATHER,S ELDEST BROTHER the FIRST DAUGHTER was named after the MOTHER,S MOTHER the SECOND DAUGHTER after the FATHER,S MOTHER the THIRD DAUGHTER after the MOTHER the FOURTH DAUGHTER after the MOTHER,S ELDEST SISTER no mention is made of pattern,s that are outside the above parameter,s. useful tool.

Ed

Ed Report 17 Mar 2006 09:50

a useful tool

Christine in Yorkshire

Christine in Yorkshire Report 17 Mar 2006 10:36

Thanks for that - any tips help! It is a lot easier than today's names will be for future generations !!

Benjamin

Benjamin Report 17 Mar 2006 11:02

Yes, if your elusive ancestor, whom you cannot find details of parentage, had children, study their names and it is likely that the parents parents were called that as well. Say your elusive ancestor John Harris and wife Elizabeth had two children Thomas and James, then it is likely that is the names of John and Elizabeth's fathers Ben

Ed

Ed Report 22 Mar 2006 13:59

nudged up to answer some Q,s

Sandra B

Sandra B Report 22 Mar 2006 14:05

This is a good one..

Chrispynoodle

Chrispynoodle Report 22 Mar 2006 14:06

I have found this to be the case much later in Scotland Chris

Vicky

Vicky Report 22 Mar 2006 14:15

depends on the family... one of mine was using names that don't seem to appear anywhere else, by about 1780-1790. And no I don't think I've gone off on the wrong branch as none of his sons or grandsons seemed to have followed the traditional pattern either. But in another family they were doing it until the 1920's. It can help sort them out if you have several families in the same area with the same surnames, but I'd still be unhappy about taking it as fact without other corroborative evidence.

Computer Blonde

Computer Blonde Report 22 Mar 2006 14:19

Thanks - could be useful when trawling through my mountain of James'!!!!!

Angela

Angela Report 22 Mar 2006 15:17

It is a really useful thing to bear in mind. Lots of mine seem to have followed the patterns and I find that it helps if you maybe have a couple of possible baptisms of children of the same name, and need to work out which one is 'yours'. Looking at the names they called their children can help you find out which were the right set of parents.

Ed

Ed Report 3 Apr 2006 17:50

nudge

Elaine

Elaine Report 15 Apr 2006 20:13

I've just checked one of my family groups 1834-1852 and sure enough the 3rd son has the same name as his father and the 3rd daughter the same name as her mother.

newforester

newforester Report 15 Apr 2006 21:10

This is an excellent one, I could see they were all using the same names in my tree, but couldn't see a pattern until now.....