Genealogy Chat
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
Workhouse Births - Additional Q?
Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
---|---|---|---|
|
Louisa | Report | 8 Aug 2011 18:26 |
Hi all, |
|||
|
brummiejan | Report | 8 Aug 2011 18:29 |
Fanny would be his natural mother. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Jill 2011 (aka Warrior Princess of Cilla!) | Report | 8 Aug 2011 18:29 |
He could have been born there as that was the nearest thing to a hospital in those days. Would be worth googling the workhouse to see if you can find out anything about its history. And, somewhere (possibly), there might be records ... |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Jonesey | Report | 8 Aug 2011 18:30 |
Firstly not every birth in a workhouse implied that the mother was an inmate. A lot of workhouses had an infirmary attached which was used as a hospital by local inhabitants. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
brummiejan | Report | 8 Aug 2011 18:32 |
Do you have this? |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Louisa | Report | 8 Aug 2011 18:36 |
I found the workhouse but there are no records for the year of his birth, only things like religion of people not actually names or anything. |
|||
|
Louisa | Report | 8 Aug 2011 18:37 |
Yes thanks Jan i am waiting for the cert :) |
|||
|
KathleenBell | Report | 8 Aug 2011 19:28 |
Did Fanny have another child called Joseph who died as there is this death in 1916:- |
|||
|
Louisa | Report | 8 Aug 2011 19:31 |
Possibly, i did see that one and made a note of it for future reference. |
|||
|
Louisa | Report | 8 Aug 2011 19:31 |
Thanks Kath x |
|||
|
KathleenBell | Report | 8 Aug 2011 19:32 |
As your grandad was born just after the war, is it possible that Fanny had him to someone else whilst her husband was away in the war? That could be a reason why he is registered with her maiden name (although by rights he should still be a Banov as that was her name at the time), even if her husband was not the father. |
|||
|
Suzanne | Report | 8 Aug 2011 21:39 |
hi.yes i agree with jonesy,my g g grandfather was born in the workhouse,but his parents were not inmates. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
sailorbaz | Report | 9 Aug 2011 04:58 |
Yes, agree with the comments here. My mother was born in the Banbury workhouse, to her unmarried mother. There was a maternity ward there and I know of several other births in this workhouse to unmarried mothers and they all kept their babies, leaving the workhouse after the birth - so were not inmates. The address on the birth certs was 144 Warwick Road, Banbury and I believe this was the practice with all workhouse births to avoid any stigma. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
KathleenBell | Report | 9 Aug 2011 09:52 |
Not all workhouses avoided putting the word "workhouse" on birth certificates. My grandfather was born in Mint Street Workhouse in London, and this was the address put on his birth certificate. His parents were married and lived just round the corner from the workhouse, so again the workhouse infirmary was used as a maternity hospital. His mother was at the workhouse for 3 weeks (which I assume was the sort of timescale that was normal after childbirth in those days (1870). |
|||
|
Potty | Report | 9 Aug 2011 14:34 |
Joseph was registered as Banov: |
|||
|
Louisa | Report | 10 Aug 2011 08:01 |
Yes i know its all very strange i think its the way its been interpreted as he was registered Banov, but all the rest of us are Banor, the v replaced with an r. |