Genealogy Chat
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
Looking for offspring IGI - query
Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
---|---|---|---|
|
brummiejan | Report | 3 Apr 2011 12:07 |
Advice please! Is there any smart way to look for children born to a marriage, other than guessing possible names and specifying parents? |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Janet | Report | 3 Apr 2011 12:48 |
Not sure if I have understood the query but it you have found a batch number then you only need to enter the surname,( no guessing the first name,) and the father's first name and the mother's first name and that should give you all the children, providing there aren't duplicate couples with the same details. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
brummiejan | Report | 3 Apr 2011 13:03 |
Thanks Janet. Sorry if I didn't put it very well! I was trying to say that, for example, if I know Fred Smith married Jane Brown how can I check for children born to the marriage? |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
ChristinaS | Report | 3 Apr 2011 13:44 |
On the old IGI form - leave the first and last name of the child blank. Then fill in the father's first and last name plus the mother's first name (don't add her surname). Then you can put in event - birth, approximate years etc. |
|||
|
Janet | Report | 3 Apr 2011 14:17 |
Hi Jan -The site isn't working at the moment, (for me) I will have another look and have a go at Christina's method when I next get in. -jl |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
wisechild | Report | 3 Apr 2011 15:29 |
Hi Jan. |
|||
|
brummiejan | Report | 3 Apr 2011 16:50 |
Well, I had no idea you could search without a name at all! This has answered my question, thanks so much. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
wisechild | Report | 3 Apr 2011 16:57 |
Jan. |
|||
|
brummiejan | Report | 3 Apr 2011 17:01 |
Thanks again, very useful info which i shall use shamelessly to advise others too! |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
wisechild | Report | 3 Apr 2011 17:17 |
You´re more than welcome Jan, especially as it was a tip I picked up from someone on Genes 4 or5 years ago. |
|||
|
mgnv | Report | 4 Apr 2011 00:09 |
There's an extensive (but incomplete) list of batch #s at: |
|||
|
SylviaInCanada | Report | 4 Apr 2011 00:25 |
I'm now using the beta.familysearch site almost exclusively .. it seems that all entries on there are extracted records. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
mgnv | Report | 4 Apr 2011 00:53 |
Sylvia - you're correct. The beta records are all extracted. However, I have found the submitted records useful on occasion - not that I normally use the batch #s for these, even if they have them However, if I've seen a submitted record that checks out, and it has a batch #, then I'll pay attention to other family details with that batch #. As always, submitted records do need care, but they can be useful. |
|||
|
SylviaInCanada | Report | 4 Apr 2011 01:42 |
mgnv |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
mgnv | Report | 4 Apr 2011 05:33 |
Sylvia - some potentially misleading wording there. The beta records aren't all taken from the old site - maybe all the old records are taken (I've never checked), but the new site has more. |
|||
|
SylviaInCanada | Report | 4 Apr 2011 06:17 |
sorry |
|||
Researching: |