Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
|
Janette
|
Report
|
15 Oct 2010 20:11 |
Hi, having found the family on the 1901 cenus, i went on to look for them on the 1891 cenus but to no avail and was wondering if another pair of eyes would help!
The family is of James Liddle born 1862 Durham and Mary Liddle born 1863 Durham. They were living in Lachester in 1901.
Thanks again Janette :)
|
|
GlitterBaby
|
Report
|
15 Oct 2010 20:15 |
1901 is this the correct family?
Name: James Liddle Age: 39 Estimated birth year: abt 1862 Relation: Head Spouse's name: Mary J Liddle Gender: Male Where born: Spennymoor, Durham, England Civil parish: Stanley Ecclesiastical parish: Beamish St Andrew Town: Stanley County/Island: Durham Country: England Street Address:
Occupation:
Condition as to marriage:
Education:
Employment status: View image Registration district: Lanchester Sub-registration district: Tanfield ED, institution, or vessel: 7 Neighbors: View others on page Household schedule number: 109 Household Members: Name Age James Liddle 39 Mary J Liddle 38 John J Liddle 18 Andrew Liddle 15 James Liddle 13 Walter Liddle 11 Lance Liddle 9 William Liddle 7 Ethel Liddle 5 Jacob W Liddle 3 Ralph Liddle 1
|
|
Janette
|
Report
|
15 Oct 2010 20:17 |
Yes, that is the family on the 1901 Census :)
|
|
SylviaInCanada
|
Report
|
15 Oct 2010 20:55 |
oh dear
one almost wants to weep!
I can't find any sign of the Liddles before 1901, not at least with any certainty.
I have found a marriage registration which MAY be correct
Marriages Mar 1880 (>99%) Bell Mary Jane Weardale 10a 293 Liddle James Weardale 10a 293
In desperation, I looked at the Public Family Trees on ancestry to see if I could get a clue ........... I'm thinking in terms of a terrible mis-transcription or even a listing under the wrong surname.
One tree has 5 attached records, 6 sources, umpteen photos ............... parents James and Mary Jane, all the children shown on the 1901 Census
BUT then you get into looking more deeply.
1891 ............ she/he has James living at home with mother and unmarried .......... mother called Mary aged 70. All quite correct, there is a census entry .............. BUT not your James
1881 .............. s/he has James living with inlaws ......... but his wife is called Elizabeth!
She has wife's name as Mary Jane Salkeld ........ but no note of when they might have married!
none of the children's records show them being found in 1891
I do hope no-one copies that tree!!!!!
Meanwhile ............ I think the Liddle family have taken off in that alien spaceship!!!
The one that deposited my gt x ??? grandfather in Buckinghamshire in 1720
sylvia
|
|
Ozibird
|
Report
|
15 Oct 2010 21:06 |
What does 1911 say because there is this one as well.
Marriages Dec 1899 Liddle James Lanchester 10a 551 <<<<< McCreesh James Lanchester 10a 551 Mulholland Mary Ann Lanchester 10a 551 Reather Mary Jane Lanchester 10a 551 <<<<<
|
|
MaureeninNY
|
Report
|
15 Oct 2010 21:11 |
1891 Ancestry Name: Walter Siddle Age: 1 Estimated birth year: abt 1890 Relation: Son Father's Name: James Siddle Gender: Male Where born: Wallsend, Northumberland, England Civil parish: Longbenton Ecclesiastical parish: Christ Church Walker Town: Walker County/Island: Northumberland Country: England Registration district: Tynemouth Sub-registration district: Longbenton ED, institution, or vessel: 1 Neighbors: View others on page Household Members: Name Age James Siddle 28 Andrew Siddle 5 James Siddle 3 Walter Siddle 1 Mary I Reather 26 John I Salkeld 8 Source Citation: Class: RG12; Piece: 4231; Folio 30; Page 54
Maureen
|
|
SylviaInCanada
|
Report
|
15 Oct 2010 21:14 |
BTW
the James with wife Elizabeth in 1881 is a coal miner
sylvia
|
|
SylviaInCanada
|
Report
|
15 Oct 2010 21:15 |
wow!
Maureen
you've cracked it methinks!!!
sylvia
|
|
Ozibird
|
Report
|
15 Oct 2010 21:18 |
Especially when you see this.
Births Jun 1891 Liddle Lance Emery Tynemouth 10b 276
1911: LIDDLE LANCE EMERY M 1892 19 Lanchester Durham
Looks like the Liddle/Reather marriage could be the right one.
|
|
Choccy
|
Report
|
15 Oct 2010 21:20 |
1911
LIDDLE, Mary Jane Head Married F 47 1864 Greenside Northumberland VIEW LIDDLE, James Son Single M 23 1888 Coal Miner Hewer Coxhoe Northumberland VIEW LIDDLE, Lance Emery Son Single M 19 1892 Coal Miner Rope Way Hand Walker Northumberland VIEW LIDDLE, William Son Single M 18 1893 Coal Miner Pony Putter Walker Northumberland VIEW LIDDLE, Ethel Daughter Single F 16 1895 Birtley Co Durham VIEW LIDDLE, Jacob Wilson Son M 13 1898 School Portobello Birtley Co Durham VIEW LIDDLE, Ralph Son M 11 1900 School Stanley Co Durham VIEW LIDDLE, Frederick Son M 8 1903 Stanley Co Durham VIEW LIDDLE, Robert Son M 7 1904 Stanley Co Durham VIEW
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- RG number: RG14 Piece: 29853 Reference: RG14PN29853 RG78PN1729 RD550 SD1 ED2 SN103 Registration District: Lanchester Sub District: Tanfield Enumeration District: 2 Parish: Stanley Address: 2 Duncombe Terrace Stanley S O County: Durham doesn't say how long married - 9 children born, 9 still living
|
|
SylviaInCanada
|
Report
|
15 Oct 2010 21:21 |
Name Age James Siddle 28 b.ca 1863, Spenry Moor, Durham, Married, Coal Miner Andrew Siddle 5 b.ca 1886, Gateshead, Durham James Siddle 3 b.ca 1888, Gateshead Walter Siddle 1 b.ca 1890, Wallsend, Northumberland Mary I Reather 26 b.ca 1865, Greenside, Durham, Married, General Servant John I Salkeld 8 b.ca 1883, Conselt, Durham, Lodger
Address:- 1 to 2 Lyne Street
It could be Mary J and John J, rather than I as the middle initial
sylvia
|
|
MaureeninNY
|
Report
|
15 Oct 2010 21:25 |
So.. Marriages Mar 1884 (>99%) REATHER Robert Lanchester 10a 359 Salkeld Mary Jane Lanchester 10a 359
Maureen
|
|
SylviaInCanada
|
Report
|
15 Oct 2010 21:25 |
from freebmd
Marriages Mar 1884 (>99%) Hopper Andrew Lanchester 10a 359 Moses William Auckland 10a 359 >>>>REATHER Robert Lanchester 10a 359 ROSSITER George S.Shields 10a 359 >>>>Salkeld Mary Jane Lanchester 10a 359 Turley Martha Lanchester 10a 359
sylvia
|
|
SylviaInCanada
|
Report
|
15 Oct 2010 21:26 |
and Robert's death
Deaths Dec 1894 (>99%) Reather Robert 50 Lanchester 10a 185
sylvia
|
|
Ozibird
|
Report
|
15 Oct 2010 21:29 |
Possibly James and Elizabeth are the right ones to follow.
1881 England Census Name: James Liddle Age: 20 Estimated birth year: abt 1861 Relation: Son in Law Spouse's name: Elizabeth Liddle Gender: Male Where born: Spennymoor, Durham, England <<<<<<<<<<<< Civil parish: Collierley County/Island: Durham Country: England Street Address: Dowlais Cottages Condition as to marriage: Married
Occupation: Coal Miner Registration district: Lanchester Sub-registration district: Tanfield Household Members: Name Age Robert Newton 39 Susan Newton 42 Robert Newton 16 Elizabeth Liddle 20 James Liddle 20
|
|
Janette
|
Report
|
17 Oct 2010 16:39 |
Hi, sorry about the late reply. It has taken me a little time to piece this together and WOW! This is great! Thank you ever EVER so much all for your help.
Janette xxx
|