Genealogy Chat
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
Could this be the one?
Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
---|---|---|---|
|
Maisy | Report | 13 Mar 2009 22:26 |
Just wanted to thank the people who added to this. |
|||
|
Pam | Report | 13 Mar 2009 09:06 |
1871 England Census |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Pam | Report | 13 Mar 2009 08:49 |
Birth Registratons for Edward Bartlett born Buckinghamshire between 1850 & 60 |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
SylviaInCanada | Report | 13 Mar 2009 02:48 |
Is this the family on the 1891? |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Maisy | Report | 12 Mar 2009 22:07 |
His name was Edward Hervey Bartlett. I thought it wouldn't be difficult to find and Edith came from Plymouth. |
|||
|
KathleenBell | Report | 12 Mar 2009 22:05 |
SNAP, Shirley :-) |
|||
|
KathleenBell | Report | 12 Mar 2009 22:04 |
There is no Edith Jarvis marriage in the March qtr. of 1887 on the complete index. |
|||
|
Shirley~I,m getting the hang of it | Report | 12 Mar 2009 21:59 |
what about this one there is one female missing |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Shirley~I,m getting the hang of it | Report | 12 Mar 2009 21:57 |
Eliza Lidstone is mistrancribed her page nos is 612 not 512 so there are two couples only on this record and this Edith Jarvis didnt marry Edward Bartlett |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Maisy | Report | 12 Mar 2009 21:56 |
Thanks to you all for replying. I was hoping it might be the right one. Can't believe they didn't marry, I won't give up just yet though. |
|||
|
KathleenBell | Report | 12 Mar 2009 21:50 |
I don't think there is a missing name - just that the marriage for Eliza Mary Lidstone in Stoke D. has been added by mistake. |
|||
|
LanarkshireLassie | Report | 12 Mar 2009 21:50 |
Hello Maisy. |
|||
|
Thelma | Report | 12 Mar 2009 21:50 |
Marriages are four names to a page. |
|||
|
Maisy | Report | 12 Mar 2009 21:41 |
I'm looking for a marriage for Edith Jarvis and Edward Bartlett. Their first child was born about 1890. I can't seem to find one for Edward but I have found this for an Edith and I can see there are not enough names although one has a different area. Could it possibly be the one I'm looking for, how can I tell? |