Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
|
Wayne
|
Report
|
28 Nov 2015 12:12 |
I am tracing an ancestor
Alice Higham or Hyam born 1854, Crewe.
She married William Henshall on 06 April 1874.
On the marriage record summary Nantwich 8a, 460 the list of people are:
William Henshall Alice Higham Alice Hyam Louisa Parr Samuel Whittingham
5 people - why not 6?
William Henshall is definitely one of my ancestors and the Crewe/Nantwich location is correct. William Henshall was born in Manchester and there is an Alice Higham on the 1871 census (birthplace Crewe) working in Manchester as a servant.
Also I cant find an Alice Higham in the Crewe area around 1861/1871
So the question is - Are Alice Higham and Alice Hyam the same person and why are there two spellings in the wedding entry?
Thanks, Wayne
|
|
Potty
|
Report
|
28 Nov 2015 12:17 |
Cheshire BMD only has the one entry:
Cheshire Marriage indexes for the years: 1871 to 1875 HENSHALL William HIGHAM Alice Crewe, St Paul Cheshire East 701/1/149
|
|
Potty
|
Report
|
28 Nov 2015 12:21 |
Father's names:
Name: Alice Higham
Gender:Female Marriage Date:6 Apr 1874 Marriage Place:St Paul, Crewe, Cheshire, England Father: Richard Higham Spouse:William Henshall
Name:William Henshall Gender:Male Marriage Date:6 Apr 1874 Marriage Place:St Paul, Crewe, Cheshire, England Father: Arthur Henshall Spouse:Alice Higham
Other records give the church as St Paul, Coppenhall, Cheshire Alice's age 20; William's 24
|
|
Shirley~I,m getting the hang of it
|
Report
|
28 Nov 2015 12:27 |
1881 England, Wales & Scotland Census Transcription 2, King Street, Monks Coppenhall, Nantwich, Cheshire, England
William Henshall Head Married Male 28 1853 Boiler Makers Laborer Middlewich, Cheshire, England
Alice Henshall Wife Married Female 27 1854 - Crewe, Cheshire, England
Jane Henshall Daughter Single Female 6 1875 Scholar Crewe, Cheshire, England
Maggie A Henshall Daughter Single Female 1 1880 - Crewe, Cheshire, England
think you would need the cert to see why there was both spellings .
|
|
Wayne
|
Report
|
28 Nov 2015 12:28 |
Thanks Potty,
Much appreciated and that now makes sense and the fathers names match my other records.
Wayne
|
|
Wayne
|
Report
|
28 Nov 2015 12:33 |
Thanks Shirley,
I have that info but nice to have another view, I'm still a little confused why there are 2 different spellings, maybe an error when recording but all the info regardless of Hyam or Higham seems to be making a match.
Jane Henshall was my great-grandmother.
|
|
Dea
|
Report
|
28 Nov 2015 12:34 |
Just added this to your duplicate thread and have now transferred it to here:
They will be the same person Wayne it's just that there was some confusion over the spelling so that she is recorded under both spellings on the marriage ref.
There should only be 4 people on the page so that is also confirmation that they are one and the same.
Dea x
|
|
Shirley~I,m getting the hang of it
|
Report
|
28 Nov 2015 12:34 |
I wonder??
1871 England, Wales & Scotland Census Transcription Graysons Yard, Wigan, Lancashire, England
Learn more
Print transcription View image Household Members First name(s) Last name Relationship Marital status Gender Age Birth year Occupation Birth place Rich Higham Head - Male 46 1825 - Lancashire, England occ coal; miner
Ann Higham Wife - Female 45 1826 - Lancashire, England
Rich Higham Son - Male 19 1852 - Lancashire, England
Alice Higham Daughter - Female 15 1856 - Lancashire, England occ cotton hand
James Higham Son - Male 11 1860 - Lancashire, England
Edit no this family seems to be consistently in Lancashire and born Wigan
|
|
MargaretM
|
Report
|
28 Nov 2015 12:44 |
This looks like her in 1861:
Allice Hyam
in the 1861 England Census Record Image View
View blank form
Name: Allice Hyam Age: 7 Estimated birth year: 1854 Relation: Daughter Father's name: Richard Hyam Mother's name: Ann Hyam Gender: Female Where born: Monks Coppenhall, Cheshire, England Civil Parish: Monks Coppenhall Ecclesiastical parish: Christchurch Town: Crewe County/Island: Cheshire Country: England Registration district: Nantwich Sub-registration district: Wybunbury ED, institution, or vessel: 9 Neighbors: View others on page Household schedule number: 156 Piece: 2616 Folio: 46 Page Number: 33 Household Members: Name Age Richard Hyam 45 Ann Hyam 49 James Hyam 20 Jane Hyam 17 Thomas Hyam 12 Joseph Hyam 9 Allice Hyam 7 Elizabeth Hyam 5 Mary E Hyam 2 Walter Hyam 1/12
|
|
MargaretM
|
Report
|
28 Nov 2015 12:47 |
Shirley, I believe this is her in 1871:
Alice Hyam
in the 1871 England Census Record Image View
View blank form
Name: Alice Hyam Age: 17 Estimated birth year: abt 1854 Relation: Servant Gender: Female Where born: Crewe, Cheshire, England Civil Parish: Manchester Ecclesiastical parish: St Paul County/Island: Lancashire Country: England Registration district: Manchester Sub-registration district: London Road ED, institution, or vessel: 22 Household schedule number: 66 Piece: 4043 Folio: 148 Page Number: 14 Household Members: Name Age John Oldham 66 Thos Oldham 36 Elzha Oldham 29 Saml Oldham 16 Emiline Oldham 14 Alice Hyam 17
|
|
Wayne
|
Report
|
28 Nov 2015 12:47 |
Thanks Dea,
That's very helpful, I was wondering if there should only be 4 persons :-)
|
|
Dea
|
Report
|
28 Nov 2015 13:06 |
Yes - there were usually 2 marriage entries per page at that time so 2 males and 2 females.
Remember - many people were illiterate at the time and so the vicar would fill in the marriage entry and he may have written it with one spelling then if the bride or groom had managed to sign their name (as some of them had learned to do) they may have spelled it differently but would not necessarily notice their error.
When the transcription was done this may have been noted and both spellings were put down or the writing on there may have just been very difficult to decipher? It often happened.
Dea x
|
|
Wayne
|
Report
|
29 Nov 2015 11:39 |
Thanks Dea, that's really useful info....and thanks to everyone else who replied.
Margee - I'm in agreement with your post, it would give an explanation of the Manchester/Crewe connections.
|
|
Jeremy
|
Report
|
6 Jan 2016 21:37 |
Wayne,
I have copies of various certificates that may shed some light here:
Birth certificate, 6th April, 1854: Born 10th March 1854 at 12 Betley Street, Monks Coppenhall (sub-district of Wybunbury, Nantwich, County of Chester) to parents Richard Higham (Striker) and Ann Higham (formerly Greenhough).
Marriage certificate: April 6th, 1874: Alice Higham, 20, spinster, no occupation, of the parish of St Paul, Crewe (father: Richard Higham, smith) married William Henshall, 21, bachelor, striker, of the parish of St Paul, Crewe (father: Arthur Henshall shoemaker), at St Paul's Church in Crewe. Witnesses: Joseph Higham and Fanny Henshall. Registered in Nantwich (Hyam, Alice 1874 Q2, vol 8a, Page 484). On the marriage certificate she is given as both Alice Higham, and then Alice Hyam.
NB, you can see in the above record that her brother, Joseph, also married a Henshall. Here, after one generation, the descendants of Joseph and Fanny become Hyams.
Mother's death certificate, 1888: at death of her mother on 21st February, she is resident at 11 Broom Street, Monks Coppenhall.
Alice's father was born in Aspull, Wigan on 2nd July 1820. He was Christened Richard Hickham (sic) and this is why he is so difficult to find. (Interestingly, while this branch of the Highams are definitely from Aspull, the village of Higham in Barnsley is pronounced Hickam in the local accent.)
Richard's surname was recorded correctly as Higham for much of his life but his death was recorded under Richard Hyam, in Monks Coppenhall in 11 May 1867. His father was James Higham, my great, great, great grandfather.
I have much more information if you or any-one else wishes, if so: message me.
Jeremy Higham
|
|
greyghost
|
Report
|
6 Jan 2016 22:10 |
Welcome to the boards Jeremy.
Despite Wayne's posts being less than a couple of months old, he may not be looking for replies now and GR will not inform him that there are any on the thread.
Suggest you click on his name to send him a personal message through the system. This way GR will notify him that he has a message, as long as he hasn't changed the email address that he registered with the site. All you have to hope then is that he gets and opens it and he can then reply directly to you.
Please remove your email address from your post - it's not advised as it's an open site and everything can be found by googling! Anyone who wants to reply to you directly can do so by clicking on your name.
|