Find Ancestors
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
Cannot find on 1911 census can anyone help?
Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
---|---|---|---|
|
Linda | Report | 9 Jul 2015 14:55 |
Hi, I have a family group who I just cannot locate any way on the 1911. Henry Nash born 1849, born Bridgewater Somerset, wife, Alice born London 1860. they would have been married approx. 17yrs (his 2nd marriage) Living in Paddington, Middx/London, address in 1901 Bravingdon Rd, Paddington, there should have been at least one son at home my Grandfather Henry Charles Nash born Paddington 1898, if anyone can find them I would be very grateful, I know neither parent were deceased at that time. |
|||
|
Maddie | Report | 9 Jul 2015 15:07 |
First name(s) Last name Relationship Marital status Sex Occupation Age Birth year Birth place |
|||
|
Andrew | Report | 9 Jul 2015 15:52 |
Ancestry version. Corrections submitted. |
|||
|
MargaretM | Report | 9 Jul 2015 16:51 |
The Ancestry version says married 16 years, 5 children born, 3 had died. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Linda | Report | 9 Jul 2015 18:07 |
Thank you, no wonder I couldn't find it! I was looking on the ;other' site & even when I put in the finer details you gave it didn't come up, ended up trawling through the records for the right area & when I found it virtually the whole transcription was wrong, Harry for Henry, Laura for Lillian(age 51 instead of 15) & even the address was 23 instead of 21 even though the writing on the record was clear enough. Still confused with Lillian tho, not come across her before she wasn't on 1901 'tho she would only have been 5 as born 1896, but did find a baptism record which tallies correctly, & that's without the other 2 children (non living) that I knew nothing about. |
|||
|
ArgyllGran | Report | 9 Jul 2015 22:02 |
Five children are alive in 1901. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
rootgatherer | Report | 9 Jul 2015 22:11 |
The two oldest children on the 1901 census would be from his fist marriage if he and Alice had been married 17 years in 1911. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
ArgyllGran | Report | 9 Jul 2015 22:39 |
This looks like the family in 1891. All born in Bridgewater, except the two youngest, born Paddington. (Although the father is a sailmaker.) |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
mgnv | Report | 12 Jul 2015 09:45 |
Ancestry and FMP/GR/FS transcriptions can differ, sometimes quite alarmingly - FMP/GR/FS is generally better. |
|||
|
Linda | Report | 22 Jul 2015 21:58 |
Thank you to everybody, you' ve all helped greatly, even to the point of clarifying whether it's worth subscribing to both of the other popular sites! thank you |
|||
|
Jill 2011 (aka Warrior Princess of Cilla!) | Report | 25 Jul 2015 13:44 |
Do you have the marriage? |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Linda | Report | 29 Jul 2015 23:44 |
Yes Jill, thank you, the marriage I had & the fact it looked like his daughter married the same day!! How sweet & a nice addition to family history. :-D |