Find Ancestors
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
Pattinson, Cumbria 1800-1950
Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
---|---|---|---|
|
julesfarthing | Report | 13 May 2015 08:10 |
Thanks mgnv this is very useful and definitely an ancestor. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
mgnv | Report | 13 May 2015 01:40 |
Check out http://www.cumbria.gov.uk/archives/ - in partic, the Kendal branch is my guess. |
|||
|
julesfarthing | Report | 11 May 2015 22:01 |
Thank you for looking on my behalf. I just hope I find more before I get too old! |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Gritty | Report | 11 May 2015 21:01 |
No, I'm not a relative. The records above have come from Familysearch (it's free to use): |
|||
|
julesfarthing | Report | 11 May 2015 20:10 |
Thanks Gritty. It is all a bit confusing. It is possible that Samuel was illegitimate, its beginning to look more like it. Where do I get confirmation online? Because it is such a long while ago the records may have been destroyed? I appreciate your help. Ar you replying becuse you may be a relative? |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Gritty | Report | 11 May 2015 19:14 |
I think it's confusing as on your earlier thread you were given the baptisms below as possible siblings for Samuel. However, these have William listed as their father- I suppose it's possible that William as the father is fictional, or, that the transcription of Samuel's record is incorrect- but without seeing the original baptism record for Samuel we can only assume that he is illegitimate: |
|||
|
julesfarthing | Report | 11 May 2015 18:13 |
I don't think there is any need to snap. I am just trying to get everything straight in my head, which is not as young as it was! Thank you for your help. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
julesfarthing | Report | 11 May 2015 16:02 |
Right, so where can I find the info which proves Samuel was illegitimate and which is the correct data for Agnas? |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Gritty | Report | 11 May 2015 15:01 |
She may not have been married when she had Samuel, but she could have married later, after Samuel's birth. |
|||
|
julesfarthing | Report | 11 May 2015 14:58 |
Thanks,but I think her married name was Pattinson because her husband was Pattinson. Or else she didn't marry. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Gritty | Report | 11 May 2015 14:30 |
She may have married? I'll put this up just in case: |
|||
|
malyon | Report | 11 May 2015 13:01 |
|
|||
|
safc | Report | 11 May 2015 12:53 |
|
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
safc | Report | 11 May 2015 12:52 |
|
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
safc | Report | 11 May 2015 12:52 |
|
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
julesfarthing | Report | 11 May 2015 11:33 |
It is beginning to look as if Agnas was not married when she had Samuel. I am going to look up the name of Robinson in case that was her maiden name. Thanks for all the replies. I shall be back! |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
safc | Report | 11 May 2015 10:47 |
|
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Gritty | Report | 11 May 2015 10:30 |
Hello Jules |
|||
|
julesfarthing | Report | 11 May 2015 10:25 |
In particular I am trying to find the family of Agnas b. 1790's, her married surname was Pattinson. She had a son Samuel. |
|||
Researching: |