Find Ancestors
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
1851 help please
Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
---|---|---|---|
|
cane | Report | 22 Apr 2015 21:55 |
Good Evening: |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Chrissie2394 | Report | 22 Apr 2015 22:10 |
I'm struggling to find them on FMP in 1851 yet Michael and Hannah are there in the 1861 census. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
KathleenBell | Report | 22 Apr 2015 22:21 |
I can't find them either but I'm wondering about this couple (not Michael) but the image is a printed sheet and there seems to be other mistakes on it i.e. the address so could be worth checking:- |
|||
|
Andrew | Report | 22 Apr 2015 22:24 |
Could this be them with wrong name for Hannah (Mary)? |
|||
|
cane | Report | 22 Apr 2015 22:26 |
No Kathleen, my Edward was was born in manchester and married married in 1845,and this Hannah is too young :-( |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
KathleenBell | Report | 22 Apr 2015 22:30 |
That does seem a possibility Andrew. This is the Findmypast version:- |
|||
|
cane | Report | 22 Apr 2015 22:30 |
Yes i also stumbled upon that one Andrew, this gets more confusing :-S |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
PollyPoppet | Report | 22 Apr 2015 22:31 |
this looks like them in 1861 |
|||
|
KathleenBell | Report | 22 Apr 2015 22:32 |
I realised that the details were wrong Cane - it's just the address was close to where they lived in 1861 and there seemed to be other mistakes on the transcription so I thought it was worth looking at, but now Andrew has come up with a better bet for you. |
|||
|
cane | Report | 22 Apr 2015 22:33 |
polly poppet :-). correct and i have this info :-) |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
GlitterBaby | Report | 22 Apr 2015 22:34 |
1851 has pieces missing from Lancashire so might just be unlucky |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
cane | Report | 22 Apr 2015 22:34 |
Thanks Kathleen x |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
cane | Report | 22 Apr 2015 22:36 |
Thanks Glitter...Just my luck :-( |
|||
Researching: |