Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
|
Gee
|
Report
|
25 Oct 2010 12:29 |
I dont know one end of Dorset from the other...
England & Wales Christening Records, 1530-1906 about Samuel Turner Name: Samuel Turner Gender: Male Birth Date: abt 1718 Christening Date: Feb 1718 Christening Place: Halstock, Dorset, England Father's name: William Turner
|
|
Gee
|
Report
|
25 Oct 2010 12:30 |
England & Wales Christening Records, 1530-1906 about Grace Turner OR Harner Name: Grace Turner OR Harner Gender: Female Birth Date: abt 1775 Christening Date: 26 Feb 1775 Christening Place: Chardstock, Dorset, England Father's name: Samuel Turner OR Harner Mother's name: Joan
England & Wales Christening Records, 1530-1906 about John Turner OR Harner Name: John Turner OR Harner Gender: Male Birth Date: abt 1776 Christening Date: 17 Mar 1776 Christening Place: Chardstock, Dorset, England Father's name: Samuel Turner OR Harner Mother's name: Joan
England & Wales Christening Records, 1530-1906 about Elizabeth Turner OR Harner Name: Elizabeth Turner OR Harner Gender: Female Birth Date: abt 1778 Christening Date: 27 Sep 1778 Christening Place: Chardstock, Dorset, England Father's name: Samuel Turner OR Harner Mother's name: Joan
England & Wales Christening Records, 1530-1906 about Thomas Turner OR Harner Name: Thomas Turner OR Harner Gender: Male Birth Date: abt 1780 Christening Date: 31 Dec 1780 Christening Place: Chardstock, Dorset, England Father's name: Samuel Turner OR Harner Mother's name: Joan
|
|
Dea
|
Report
|
25 Oct 2010 12:33 |
Can't find anything on Samuel Turner yet. - Are you sure there is a Tree on Ancestry with him in it or are you just wanting to see if there is one?
There is this on Joseph:
Joseph Palmer Birth: 12 Feb 1722 - Charminster, Dorset Death: 1781 - Little Bredy, Dorset, England Marriage: 3 May 1748 - Little Bredy, Dorset, England Spouse: Jane White F: William Palmer M: Elizabeth Gillingham
It is from someone's tree but I can't get into the tree at the moment - It may have been removed or it may be a problem with the site - I will keep trying.
Dea x
|
|
Dea
|
Report
|
25 Oct 2010 12:40 |
Another tree shows these children:
Spouse & Children Jane White – 1772 Betty Palmer 1749 – 1749 Jenny Palmer 1750 – Sarah Palmer 1752 – Joseph Palmer 1755 – Henry Palmer 1756 – Richard Palmer 1757 – William Palmer 1759 – Katherine Palmer 1762 – John Palmer 1765 – Betty Palmer 1771 – 1771
Dea x
|
|
Dea
|
Report
|
25 Oct 2010 12:43 |
OOhh Ginny's been busy on the Turner's - I am still 'plodding' through the Palmers
Going for another 'plod' !
Dea x
|
|
Renes
|
Report
|
25 Oct 2010 12:44 |
Oh Gins thanks
thats not him - unfortunately - Chardstock is only 10 miles from Netherbury but that marriage is to late Joan died at Netherbury in 1764
Good try thought
|
|
Renes
|
Report
|
25 Oct 2010 12:54 |
Dee
No not certain there is a tree - just poking around ------
trying to get a bit further back -------
thats great - yes thats my Palmer clan ---------will check out the mother and father listed -------
those are the kids too ---- poor old Betty ---- not a lucky name -------we have another Betty who died as infant ----after 3 they never used the name again
EDIT
Thanks Dee --- please see if you can break in to that tree ---- I am going to Dorsetopc - to hunt down those parents ----
Thanks Thanks
|
|
Renes
|
Report
|
25 Oct 2010 13:05 |
Gins
I think the Halstock one may be GOOD ---- see email below recd Friday from opcdorset researcher
Any more Halstock --- Turners - there are some on pilotFS so will go there now
Thanks Thanks
A Samuel Turner born February 1718 at Halstock, son of William Turner . Halstock is in the Beaminster/Netherbury area - . It's a very tiny place with only a few hundred inhabitants, so perhaps Netherbury was the nearest large place. It was more important than Beaminster in former times. There were Turners there in 1600 , but there are no records on line. There were the following Joans baptised around 1721: 1717 Joan of John Hosford 1717 Joan of William Crabb 1721 Joanna of Charles Rendall 1725 Joanne of John Maber 1727 Joan of Mr. John Symes 1727 Joan of Isaac Day The John Turner of 1742 was son of Samuel Turner The Jonathan Turner of 1747 was son of Samuel and Joan Turner. So the Halstock records may produce some results. Can you get the LDS films in Spain ?
I suppose there would be a Family Centre in a lar
|
|
jax
|
Report
|
25 Oct 2010 13:06 |
I see this thread has turned into a TTF again lol
Stupid white envelope is'nt working again, recieved two thank you's this morning neither of them do I know what its for and I am not going through all my threads to find them. Just hope they understood my instructions on how to reply properly...or cyn will be after me
ja...x
|
|
Dea
|
Report
|
25 Oct 2010 13:07 |
Still can't get in but I tried another way and at least I have a marriage date:
29th April, 1722 - Dorset.
Dea x
|
|
Gee
|
Report
|
25 Oct 2010 13:10 |
England & Wales Marriages, 1538-1940 about Joseph Palmer Name: Joseph Palmer Gender: Male Spouse's name: Jane White Marriage Date: 3 May 1748 Marriage Place: Little Bredy, Dorset, England
England & Wales Marriages, 1538-1940 about Joseph Palmer Name: Joseph Palmer Gender: Male Spouse's name: Mary Vine Marriage Date: 30 Jun 1774 Marriage Place: Little Bredy, Dorset, England
|
|
Gee
|
Report
|
25 Oct 2010 13:13 |
Did he have a thrid wife?
England & Wales Marriages, 1538-1940 about Joseph Palmer Name: Joseph Palmer Gender: Male Spouse's name: Ann Haynes Marriage Date: 5 Jan 1779 Marriage Place: Long Bredy, Dorset, England
|
|
Renes
|
Report
|
25 Oct 2010 13:16 |
Yes thats my mob Ginny -------I want his ma and pa
thanks
Sorry Jax --------would post on a thread - but "they" can all copy my tree
at least it is a couple of thank you pm s -- better than the other sort !
|
|
Renes
|
Report
|
25 Oct 2010 13:20 |
No Gins thats his sons wife ----
they moved from Little Bredy to Long Bredy next door and filled that up with Palmers as well
|
|
Renes
|
Report
|
25 Oct 2010 13:25 |
Yes thats his two wives --- Poor old Jane ------had all those 10 kids - last one Betty died Nov 1771
and died 17 May 1772
My poor old Granny
|
|
Renes
|
Report
|
25 Oct 2010 13:26 |
Oh well done Dea .... my little code breaker
give a bit more info to search them out
Thanks
|
|
jax
|
Report
|
25 Oct 2010 13:34 |
Dont know about anyone else, but there seems to be a lot of activity going on with trees on ancestry at the moment.
I used to see the odd person added and the tree owner I knew to be related. This week there has been all sorts where someone has copied everything including stealing photos and war records for people that are not directly related to him, to others adding my ancestors just because it fits with names and dates. The fact its the wrong part of the country does'nt matter.
ja...x
|
|
Renes
|
Report
|
25 Oct 2010 13:48 |
Ja x
I have been reading that - not sure here or on Rootschat - some one was trying to ask how to get back copies of birth cert/ photos etc -
and as you say - some not even correct -
it is a problem -
If I knew what I know now when I started - I would not have given access quite so freely
I know I have asked for info - but would never add it - is just another line of names to check out - I am lucky as Dorset opc s are superb -and cill check out anything you ask - my main man who has helped me immensely goes to the History centre in Dorset once a month ans looks up any record thats has not been transcribed ---- he the best
Renes
|
|
FannyByGaslight
|
Report
|
25 Oct 2010 14:22 |
My tree on Ancestry is private due someone adding my grandparents names to his tree once. But I sent him many messages asking for them to be taken off as we were not in the slightest related and wrote comments all over his tree also and he took my grandparents names (with totally wrong details of their marriage ,death and children),off his tree...sharpish I am very careful who I let see my full tree and want to know exact connection first.
|
|
jax
|
Report
|
25 Oct 2010 14:33 |
This person took the details from someone elses I would think because she was the one with the photos. She has my grandfather but fair enough our grandfathers were brothers, this blokes only relationship to this part of the family is that his gt grandmother and our gt grandmother were sisters, so our line is not related at all...so why have photos of our family? b&$$£y name collectors
ja...x
|